Loading page content.
TopEmployer × claim type
Tribunal Watch has indexed 1 case involving working time regulations claims against Rohit Vikal PRELIMINARY HEARING BY TELEPHONE, out of 1 total case on record for this employer. See also all working time regulations cases across every employer.
| Case ref. | Decided | Jurisdiction | Claimant | Claim types | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3314083/2021 | 18 January 2023 | England & Wales | Ms Natalie Lawrence | Breach of contract, Disability discrimination, Equal pay, Whistleblowing, Unfair dismissal, Working time regulations | — |
This page lists the subset of Rohit Vikal PRELIMINARY HEARING BY TELEPHONE's tribunal cases tagged with working time regulations in the §4.4 claim-type taxonomy. A single judgment frequently combines multiple claim types, so the same case may appear on more than one claim-type page. Award figures are taken from the remedy section of each judgment where present; cases without a quantified award — because the tribunal only determined liability, or because the remedy hearing is pending — are listed with no award amount. See how the data is built.