Loading page content.
TopEmployer file
Since 2017, 's actions not that another non-discriminatory reason is being advanced by the employer. The employer might be discriminating against the employee subconsciously. It i's therefore important to identify the two stage test and then consider what facts have been established at the first stage and whether these are sufficient to shift the burden of proof and if so what is the has appeared as a respondent in 1 employment tribunal case, with £0 in total awards recorded against the employer.
| # | Claim type | Cases | Relative share |
|---|---|---|---|
| 01 | Race discrimination | 1 |
| Case ref. | Decided | Jurisdiction | Claimant | Claim types | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8001901/2024 | 14 August 2026 | Scotland | Mr J Katkoria | Race discrimination | — |
Data extracted from published employment tribunal judgments on gov.uk. Case reference, decision date, judge, venue and claim categories come from structured metadata. Claimant and respondent names are extracted from the judgment PDF text, and a second LLM-assisted pass adds per-claim outcomes, key findings, and any compensation awarded. Many UK tribunal decisions are liability-only — the remedy is set at a later hearing — so a case can correctly show an outcome with no award figure. See how the data is built.