Loading page content.
TopEmployer × claim type
Tribunal Watch has indexed 1 case involving disability discrimination claims against ’s evidence that she had raised the issue of the lack of facilities on September in her appeal in December 2020 was not disputed.10 58. I took into account that both of the claims in the proposed amendments sought to rely on facts pled in the original ET 1, and that it was the, out of 1 total case on record for this employer. See also all .
| Case ref. | Decided | Jurisdiction | Claimant | Claim types | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4110004/2021 | 14 June 2022 | Scotland | Mrs Natalie Ann Wright | Disability discrimination | — |
This page lists the subset of ’s evidence that she had raised the issue of the lack of facilities on September in her appeal in December 2020 was not disputed.10 58. I took into account that both of the claims in the proposed amendments sought to rely on facts pled in the original ET 1, and that it was the's tribunal cases tagged with disability discrimination in the §4.4 claim-type taxonomy. A single judgment frequently combines multiple claim types, so the same case may appear on more than one claim-type page. Award figures are taken from the remedy section of each judgment where present; cases without a quantified award — because the tribunal only determined liability, or because the remedy hearing is pending — are listed with no award amount. See how the data is built.