Loading page content.
Employer file
Since 2017, ’s position was that the facts on which that claim is based are set out in the ET and that she just put the name of the legislation relied on when asked for further particulars.15 40. In response to the has appeared as a respondent in employment tribunal case.
| # | Claim type | Cases |
|---|---|---|
| 01 | Disability discrimination | 1 |
| Case ref. | Decided | Jurisdiction | Claimant | Claim types | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4110004/2021 | 14 June 2022 | Scotland | Mrs Natalie Ann Wright | Disability discrimination | — |
Data extracted from published employment tribunal judgments on gov.uk. Case reference, decision date, judge, venue and claim categories come from structured metadata. Claimant and respondent names are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Outcomes and compensation are not yet populated for every case — see how the data is built.