Employment tribunal cases against ’s position was that the TTP role was a suitable alternative for him and that he would have taken the role, albeit he conceded that he would be looking for alternative roles both internally and externally. 57. There was no dispute between the parties that the TTP project was a strategically important project for the

Since 2017, ’s position was that the TTP role was a suitable alternative for him and that he would have taken the role, albeit he conceded that he would be looking for alternative roles both internally and externally. 57. There was no dispute between the parties that the TTP project was a strategically important project for the has appeared as a respondent in 1 employment tribunal case, with £0 in total awards recorded against the employer.

Total cases: 1
Total awarded against: £0
Largest award: —
Most common claim: Unfair dismissal

Indexed: 5 May 2026

Cases by claim type

1 distinct category

#	Claim type	Cases
01	Unfair dismissal	1

All cases

1 case · chronological

Case ref.	Decided	Jurisdiction	Claimant	Claim types	Award
8000083/2023	5 July 2023	Scotland	Mr R Alexander, solicitor Judgment The	Unfair dismissal	—

Methodology

Data extracted from published employment tribunal judgments on gov.uk. Case reference, decision date, judge, venue and claim categories come from structured metadata. Claimant and respondent names are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Outcomes and compensation are not yet populated for every case — see how the data is built.

’s position was that the TTP role was a suitable alternative for him and that he would have taken the role, albeit he conceded that he would be looking for alternative roles both internally and externally. 57. There was no dispute between the parties that the TTP project was a strategically important project for the — employment tribunal cases | Tribunal Watch