Employer file
Since 2017, ’s position was that the TTP role was a suitable alternative for him and that he would have taken the role, albeit he conceded that he would be looking for alternative roles both internally and externally. 57. There was no dispute between the parties that the TTP project was a strategically important project for the has appeared as a respondent in 1 employment tribunal case, with £0 in total awards recorded against the employer.
| # | Claim type | Cases | Relative share |
|---|---|---|---|
| 01 | Unfair dismissal | 1 |
| Case ref. | Decided | Jurisdiction | Claimant | Claim types | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8000083/2023 | 5 July 2023 | Scotland | Mr R Alexander, solicitor Judgment The | Unfair dismissal | — |
Data extracted from published employment tribunal judgments on gov.uk. Case reference, decision date, judge, venue and claim categories come from structured metadata. Claimant and respondent names are extracted from the judgment PDF text, and a second LLM-assisted pass adds per-claim outcomes, key findings, and any compensation awarded. Many UK tribunal decisions are liability-only — the remedy is set at a later hearing — so a case can correctly show an outcome with no award figure. See how the data is built.