Employer file

Employment tribunal cases against ’s representative accepted that the proposed amendment re sex discrimination is ‘more of a relabelling than a new claim’. It was argued that the proposed amendment re the section claim is not a re-labelling. It was confirmed that objection was made to both proposed amendments. They invited consideration of the following 4110004/2021 Page factors in considering whether or not the amendment should be allowed: time bar; time limits; whether it was the addition of new facts and the timing and manner of the application. 43. The

Since 2017, ’s representative accepted that the proposed amendment re sex discrimination is ‘more of a relabelling than a new claim’. It was argued that the proposed amendment re the section claim is not a re-labelling. It was confirmed that objection was made to both proposed amendments. They invited consideration of the following 4110004/2021 Page factors in considering whether or not the amendment should be allowed: time bar; time limits; whether it was the addition of new facts and the timing and manner of the application. 43. The has appeared as a respondent in 1 employment tribunal case, with £0 in total awards recorded against the employer.