Loading…

Unfair dismissal cases against ’s role was redundant in terms of section ERA. It was satisfied that it was. The decision of the — employment tribunal data | Tribunal Watch

Employer × claim type

Unfair dismissal cases against ’s role was redundant in terms of section ERA. It was satisfied that it was. The decision of the

Tribunal Watch has indexed 1 case involving unfair dismissal claims against ’s role was redundant in terms of section ERA. It was satisfied that it was. The decision of the, out of 1 total case on record for this employer. See also all unfair dismissal cases across every employer.

Unfair dismissal cases: 1
Total awarded: —
Share of employer caseload: 100%

All unfair dismissal cases against ’s role was redundant in terms of section ERA. It was satisfied that it was. The decision of the

1 case · chronological

Case ref.	Decided	Jurisdiction	Claimant	Claim types	Award
8000083/2023	5 July 2023	Scotland	Mr R Alexander, solicitor Judgment The	Unfair dismissal	—

Methodology

This page lists the subset of ’s role was redundant in terms of section ERA. It was satisfied that it was. The decision of the's tribunal cases tagged with unfair dismissal in the §4.4 claim-type taxonomy. A single judgment frequently combines multiple claim types, so the same case may appear on more than one claim-type page. Award figures are taken from the remedy section of each judgment where present; cases without a quantified award — because the tribunal only determined liability, or because the remedy hearing is pending — are listed with no award amount. See how the data is built.