Loading page content.
Employer file
Since 2017, ’ submissions were to the effect that the application should not be refused solely because there has been delay in making it as amendments may be made at any stage of the proceedings. Delay in making the application is a discretionary factor. It is relevant to consider why the application was not made earlier. The amendment application was made shortly after the has appeared as a respondent in 1 employment tribunal case, with £0 in total awards recorded against the employer.
| # | Claim type | Cases |
|---|---|---|
| 01 | Breach of contract | 1 |
| 02 | Redundancy | 1 |
| 03 | Unfair dismissal | 1 |
| 04 | Working time regulations | 1 |
| Case ref. | Decided | Jurisdiction | Claimant | Claim types | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4103802/2022 | 13 April 2023 | Scotland | (sitting alone)5 Mr J Taylor | Breach of contract, Redundancy, Unfair dismissal, Working time regulations | — |
Data extracted from published employment tribunal judgments on gov.uk. Case reference, decision date, judge, venue and claim categories come from structured metadata. Claimant and respondent names are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Outcomes and compensation are not yet populated for every case — see how the data is built.