Loading…

Redundancy cases against Submitted that the amendments were not minor in nature. The amendment presented an entirely new and contradictory primary claim and was contrary to the overriding objective.10 30. If alowed the amendment would cause further delay to the proceedings as the — employment tribunal data | Tribunal Watch

Employer × claim type

Redundancy cases against Submitted that the amendments were not minor in nature. The amendment presented an entirely new and contradictory primary claim and was contrary to the overriding objective.10 30. If alowed the amendment would cause further delay to the proceedings as the

Tribunal Watch has indexed 1 case involving redundancy claims against Submitted that the amendments were not minor in nature. The amendment presented an entirely new and contradictory primary claim and was contrary to the overriding objective.10 30. If alowed the amendment would cause further delay to the proceedings as the, out of 1 total case on record for this employer. See also all redundancy cases across every employer.

Redundancy cases: 1
Total awarded: —
Share of employer caseload: 100%

All redundancy cases against Submitted that the amendments were not minor in nature. The amendment presented an entirely new and contradictory primary claim and was contrary to the overriding objective.10 30. If alowed the amendment would cause further delay to the proceedings as the

1 case · chronological

Case ref.	Decided	Jurisdiction	Claimant	Claim types	Award
4103802/2022	13 April 2023	Scotland	(sitting alone)5 Mr J Taylor	Breach of contract, Redundancy, Unfair dismissal, Working time regulations	—

Methodology

This page lists the subset of Submitted that the amendments were not minor in nature. The amendment presented an entirely new and contradictory primary claim and was contrary to the overriding objective.10 30. If alowed the amendment would cause further delay to the proceedings as the's tribunal cases tagged with redundancy in the §4.4 claim-type taxonomy. A single judgment frequently combines multiple claim types, so the same case may appear on more than one claim-type page. Award figures are taken from the remedy section of each judgment where present; cases without a quantified award — because the tribunal only determined liability, or because the remedy hearing is pending — are listed with no award amount. See how the data is built.