Loading…

Suggested in submissions that he did not accept that his role was redundant, he had not led any evidence to suggest that this was the case, nor challenged the — employment tribunal cases | Tribunal Watch

Employer file

Employment tribunal cases against Suggested in submissions that he did not accept that his role was redundant, he had not led any evidence to suggest that this was the case, nor challenged the

Since 2017, Suggested in submissions that he did not accept that his role was redundant, he had not led any evidence to suggest that this was the case, nor challenged the has appeared as a respondent in 1 employment tribunal case, with £0 in total awards recorded against the employer.

Total cases: 1
Total awarded against: £0
Largest award: —
Most common claim: Unfair dismissal

Indexed: 5 May 2026

Cases by claim type

1 distinct category

#	Claim type	Cases
01	Unfair dismissal	1

All cases

1 case · chronological

Case ref.	Decided	Jurisdiction	Claimant	Claim types	Award
8000083/2023	5 July 2023	Scotland	Mr R Alexander, solicitor Judgment The	Unfair dismissal	—

Methodology

Data extracted from published employment tribunal judgments on gov.uk. Case reference, decision date, judge, venue and claim categories come from structured metadata. Claimant and respondent names are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Outcomes and compensation are not yet populated for every case — see how the data is built.