Loading…

Redundancy cases against Thornton Processing Limited Introduction The proceedings were posted to the respondent and no response has been received by the return date. There is sufficient information on the file for me to give — employment tribunal data | Tribunal Watch

Employer × claim type

Redundancy cases against Thornton Processing Limited Introduction The proceedings were posted to the respondent and no response has been received by the return date. There is sufficient information on the file for me to give

Tribunal Watch has indexed 1 case involving redundancy claims against Thornton Processing Limited Introduction The proceedings were posted to the respondent and no response has been received by the return date. There is sufficient information on the file for me to give, out of 1 total case on record for this employer. See also all redundancy cases across every employer.

Redundancy cases: 1
Total awarded: £9,981
Share of employer caseload: 100%

All redundancy cases against Thornton Processing Limited Introduction The proceedings were posted to the respondent and no response has been received by the return date. There is sufficient information on the file for me to give

1 case · chronological

Case ref.	Decided	Jurisdiction	Claimant	Claim types	Award
1805132/2020	14 November 2020	England & Wales	Mr M Flack	Breach of contract, Redundancy, Unlawful deduction from wages, Working time regulations	£9,981

Methodology

This page lists the subset of Thornton Processing Limited Introduction The proceedings were posted to the respondent and no response has been received by the return date. There is sufficient information on the file for me to give's tribunal cases tagged with redundancy in the §4.4 claim-type taxonomy. A single judgment frequently combines multiple claim types, so the same case may appear on more than one claim-type page. Award figures are taken from the remedy section of each judgment where present; cases without a quantified award — because the tribunal only determined liability, or because the remedy hearing is pending — are listed with no award amount. See how the data is built.