Loading…

To amend her claim would be contrary to the overriding objective as it would increase the time and resources of both the Tribunal and the — employment tribunal cases | Tribunal Watch

Employer file

To amend her claim would be contrary to the overriding objective as it would increase the time and resources of both the Tribunal and the

Since 2017, To amend her claim would be contrary to the overriding objective as it would increase the time and resources of both the Tribunal and the has appeared as a respondent in 1 employment tribunal case, with £0 in total awards recorded against the employer.

Indexed: 2 August 2026

Total cases: 1
Total awarded against: £0
Largest award: —
Most common claim: Disability discrimination

Cases by claim type

1 distinct category

#	Claim type	Cases	Relative share
01	Disability discrimination	1

All cases

1 case · page 1 of 1 · chronological

Case ref.	Decided	Jurisdiction	Claimant	Claim types	Award
4110004/2021	14 June 2022	Scotland	Mrs Natalie Ann Wright	Disability discrimination	—

Methodology

Data extracted from published employment tribunal judgments on gov.uk. Case reference, decision date, judge, venue and claim categories come from structured metadata. Claimant and respondent names are extracted from the judgment PDF text, and a second LLM-assisted pass adds per-claim outcomes, key findings, and any compensation awarded. Many UK tribunal decisions are liability-only — the remedy is set at a later hearing — so a case can correctly show an outcome with no award figure. See how the data is built.