Loading…

Tribunal WatchEmployersTo be an intelligent and able advocate in his own cause. He went through the circumstances in great detail. He was generally credible and a reliable historian. Hower, there were some aspects of his evidence that I did not accept. In particular I found his interpretation of events around allegedly being given the Pool Crew Post was not consistent with the contemporaneous emails or the evidence of Ms Boston whose evidence on this matter I preferred. It is true that in hindsight the

Employer file

To be an intelligent and able advocate in his own cause. He went through the circumstances in great detail. He was generally credible and a reliable historian. Hower, there were some aspects of his evidence that I did not accept. In particular I found his interpretation of events around allegedly being given the Pool Crew Post was not consistent with the contemporaneous emails or the evidence of Ms Boston whose evidence on this matter I preferred. It is true that in hindsight the

Since 2017, To be an intelligent and able advocate in his own cause. He went through the circumstances in great detail. He was generally credible and a reliable historian. Hower, there were some aspects of his evidence that I did not accept. In particular I found his interpretation of events around allegedly being given the Pool Crew Post was not consistent with the contemporaneous emails or the evidence of Ms Boston whose evidence on this matter I preferred. It is true that in hindsight the has appeared as a respondent in 1 employment tribunal case, with £0 in total awards recorded against the employer.

Indexed: 23 September 2026

Total cases: 1
Total awarded against: £0
Largest award: —
Most common claim: Race discrimination

Cases by claim type

1 distinct category

#	Claim type	Cases	Relative share
01	Race discrimination	1

All cases

1 case · page 1 of 1 · chronological

Case ref.	Decided	Jurisdiction	Claimant	Claim types	Award
8001901/2024	14 August 2026	Scotland	Mr J Katkoria	Race discrimination	—

Methodology

Data extracted from published employment tribunal judgments on gov.uk. Case reference, decision date, judge, venue and claim categories come from structured metadata. Claimant and respondent names are extracted from the judgment PDF text, and a second LLM-assisted pass adds per-claim outcomes, key findings, and any compensation awarded. Many UK tribunal decisions are liability-only — the remedy is set at a later hearing — so a case can correctly show an outcome with no award figure. See how the data is built.

To be an intelligent and able advocate in his own cause. He went through the circumstances in great detail. He was generally credible and a reliable historian. Hower, there were some aspects of his evidence that I did not accept. In particular I found his interpretation of events around allegedly being given the Pool Crew Post was not consistent with the contemporaneous emails or the evidence of Ms Boston whose evidence on this matter I preferred. It is true that in hindsight the — employment tribunal cases | Tribunal Watch