Loading page content.
TopEmployer × claim type
Tribunal Watch has indexed 1 case involving redundancy claims against Would need time to lodge an amended response and the Hearing would need to be postponed to allow sufficient time to deal with the additional claims. 31. The claims were substantially out of time and should not be extended.15 The lack of legal advice was not sufficient as they could have obtained legal advice sooner. 32. The, out of 1 total case on record for this employer. See also all redundancy cases across every employer.
| Case ref. | Decided | Jurisdiction | Claimant | Claim types | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4103802/2022 | 13 April 2023 | Scotland | (sitting alone)5 Mr J Taylor | Breach of contract, Redundancy, Unfair dismissal, Working time regulations | — |
This page lists the subset of Would need time to lodge an amended response and the Hearing would need to be postponed to allow sufficient time to deal with the additional claims. 31. The claims were substantially out of time and should not be extended.15 The lack of legal advice was not sufficient as they could have obtained legal advice sooner. 32. The's tribunal cases tagged with redundancy in the §4.4 claim-type taxonomy. A single judgment frequently combines multiple claim types, so the same case may appear on more than one claim-type page. Award figures are taken from the remedy section of each judgment where present; cases without a quantified award — because the tribunal only determined liability, or because the remedy hearing is pending — are listed with no award amount. See how the data is built.