Working time regulations cases against Would suffer prejudice and hardship if the amendment was allowed in that additional costs would be incurred. 33. Allowing the amendment would run contrary to the overriding objective.20 34. The claims have “lack of prospects”. 35. The

Tribunal Watch has indexed 1 case involving working time regulations claims against Would suffer prejudice and hardship if the amendment was allowed in that additional costs would be incurred. 33. Allowing the amendment would run contrary to the overriding objective.20 34. The claims have “lack of prospects”. 35. The, out of 1 total case on record for this employer. See also all working time regulations cases across every employer.

Working time regulations cases: 1
Total awarded: —
Share of employer caseload: 100%

All working time regulations cases against Would suffer prejudice and hardship if the amendment was allowed in that additional costs would be incurred. 33. Allowing the amendment would run contrary to the overriding objective.20 34. The claims have “lack of prospects”. 35. The

1 case · chronological

Case ref.	Decided	Jurisdiction	Claimant	Claim types	Award
4103802/2022	13 April 2023	Scotland	(sitting alone)5 Mr J Taylor	Breach of contract, Redundancy, Unfair dismissal, Working time regulations	—

Methodology

This page lists the subset of Would suffer prejudice and hardship if the amendment was allowed in that additional costs would be incurred. 33. Allowing the amendment would run contrary to the overriding objective.20 34. The claims have “lack of prospects”. 35. The's tribunal cases tagged with working time regulations in the §4.4 claim-type taxonomy. A single judgment frequently combines multiple claim types, so the same case may appear on more than one claim-type page. Award figures are taken from the remedy section of each judgment where present; cases without a quantified award — because the tribunal only determined liability, or because the remedy hearing is pending — are listed with no award amount. See how the data is built.

Working time regulations cases against Would suffer prejudice and hardship if the amendment was allowed in that additional costs would be incurred. 33. Allowing the amendment would run contrary to the overriding objective.20 34. The claims have “lack of prospects”. 35. The — employment tribunal data | Tribunal Watch