Case 1300010/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr T Nagra v Supply Chain Coordination Limited and 1 other — 2026
- Case reference
- 1300010/2022
- Decision date
- 26 April 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Mensah Date
- Venue
- Birmingham
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Mr T Nagra
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the remote hearing on 11 August 2023 before Employment Judge Mensah, the tribunal dismissed the unfair dismissal claim against Supply Chain Coordination Limited. The tribunal found that the claimant was not an employee of the First Respondent at any time.
The tribunal also dismissed the direct sex discrimination, harassment and equal pay claims against the First Respondent. It found that the claimant was not an employee, was not under a contract of apprenticeship, and was not under a contract personally to do work for the First Respondent within s.83(2)(a) Equality Act 2010. The tribunal further found that the First Respondent was not a principal within s.41(5) Equality Act 2010 because it did not make work available to the claimant and the claimant had not shown that he was employed by another or supplied by that employer as an employee in furtherance of a contract to which the First Respondent was a party.
All claims against Unipart Group Limited were also dismissed. The tribunal held that the claimant had not shown that the Second Respondent was acting as agent for the First Respondent, and he had not pleaded any contract-worker claim because he denied any contract with the agency through which he was assigned or that he was employed by that agency or by the Second Respondent. As a result, no claims survived against either respondent.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Dismissed because the tribunal found the claimant was not an employee of the First Respondent at any time. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Sex discrimination | Dismissed because the claimant was not an employee, under a contract of apprenticeship, or under a contract personally to do work for the First Respondent within s.83(2)(a) Equality Act 2010, and the First Respondent was not a principal under s.41(5) Equality Act 2010. | Dismissed | Sex | — |
| Harassment | Dismissed on the same status and principal findings as the direct sex discrimination claim. | Dismissed | Sex | — |
| Equal pay | Dismissed on the same status and principal findings; the judgment describes this as equal pay discrimination. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- s.83(2)(a) Equality Act 2010
- s.41(5) Equality Act 2010
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.