Case 1300358/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mr E Arroyo v Premier Support Services — 2026
- Case reference
- 1300358/2025
- Decision date
- 24 March 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Beck Representation
- Venue
- Birmingham via CVP
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr E Arroyo
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the hearing on 24 March 2026 in Birmingham via CVP, Employment Judge Beck dismissed the claimant's unfair dismissal complaint against Premier Support Services. The tribunal held that the claimant did not have the two years' service required by section 108 of the Employment Rights Act, so the unfair dismissal claim could not succeed.
The tribunal also dealt with the claimant's complaints under sections 10 and 12 of the Employment Relations Act 1999. Those complaints were found to have no reasonable prospect of success and were struck out under rule 38(1)(a) of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024.
The judgment further records that the claimant confirmed he was not pursuing complaints about notice pay or outstanding wages, and those complaints were dismissed. No remedy was awarded.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Dismissed because the claimant did not have 2 years' service required by section 108 of the Employment Rights Act. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Other | Complaints under sections 10 and 12 of the Employment Relations Act 1999 were struck out under rule 38(1)(a) as having no reasonable prospect of success. | Struck out | — | — |
| Other | The claimant confirmed he did not pursue complaints in relation to notice pay or outstanding wages, and those complaints were dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- s.108 Employment Rights Act
- sections 10 and 12 Employment Relations Act 1999
- rule 38(1)(a) Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.