Case 1300496/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs T Tirzite v Severn Trent Water Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 1300496/2024
- Decision date
- 15 August 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Kenward
- Venue
- Birmingham
- Panel members
- Mr D Faulconbridge, Mrs M Rance
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs T Tirzite
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case of Mrs T Tirzite v Severn Trent Water Limited was heard at Birmingham on 12, 13, 14 and 15 August 2025 before Employment Judge Kenward, sitting with Mr D Faulconbridge and Mrs M Rance. The Claimant appeared in person and the Respondent was represented by counsel.
The tribunal held that the Claimant's complaint of unfair (constructive) dismissal was not well-founded and dismissed it. It also dismissed the Claimant's complaints of direct race discrimination and direct sex discrimination, together with the complaints of harassment related to race and harassment related to sex. The approved judgment records each claim as not well-founded and dismissed, and does not record any monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Constructive dismissal | The judgment describes this as the Claimant's complaint of unfair (constructive) dismissal. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Race discrimination | Direct race discrimination. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Sex discrimination | Direct sex discrimination. | Dismissed | Sex | — |
| Harassment | Harassment related to race. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Harassment | Harassment related to sex. | Dismissed | Sex | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.