Case 1300522/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr T Kolaitis v DX Network Services Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 1300522/2019
- Decision date
- 4 December 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Mark Butler
- Venue
- Birmingham
- Panel members
- Mr D McIntosh, Ms E Shenton
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr T Kolaitis
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Employment Tribunal at Birmingham, constituted by Employment Judge Mark Butler with Mr D McIntosh and Ms E Shenton as members, heard the case over several days in November and December 2020. In its unanimous judgment, it dismissed the claimant’s direct race discrimination claims, the claims for harassment related to race, and the claim of constructive unfair dismissal. The judgment records each of those claims as ill-founded.
The decision also states that, for the avoidance of doubt, all claims in the case were dismissed. No monetary award is recorded, and the judgment notes that written reasons would be prepared and sent to the parties in due course.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race discrimination | The tribunal found the direct race discrimination claims were ill-founded and dismissed them. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Harassment | The tribunal found the claims for harassment related to race were ill-founded and dismissed them. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Constructive dismissal | The tribunal found the constructive unfair dismissal claim was ill founded and dismissed it. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.