Case 1300668/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr I. Maheshe v West Midlands Travel Ltd t/a National Express West Midlands — 2020
- Case reference
- 1300668/2019
- Decision date
- 13 October 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Dean Representation
- Venue
- Birmingham
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr I. Maheshe
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr I. Maheshe brought claims of direct race discrimination and harassment arising from an incident on 18 September 2018 on a staff bus. The tribunal recorded his account that he was asked to leave the bus, assaulted, and not supported by management, and that he later raised a grievance through his union on 2 November 2018. The tribunal did not determine the factual merits of those allegations because it found the original complaint was presented outside the three-month limit in s123 Equality Act 2010.
The tribunal found that ACAS early conciliation began on 19 February 2019 and that the ET1 presented on 21 February 2019 was about 66 or 67 days late. It refused to extend time on the just and equitable basis. In doing so, it relied on the claimant's awareness of the facts, his Equality Act rights, and the tribunal time limit by November 2018, together with the fact that he had trade union support and identified no obstacle that prevented a timely claim. It also noted that the delay would affect the cogency of the evidence.
The claimant also sought to amend the claim to allege discrimination in the respondent's handling of the investigation into the 18 September 2018 incident and the handling of his grievance, including the grievance outcome on 14 February 2019 and the investigation outcome on 27 November 2018. Applying Selkent, the tribunal held that these were substantial new factual allegations and not mere particulars of the original claim. It refused permission to amend because the new allegations were out of time and the balance of hardship favoured the respondent. The claim was therefore dismissed and no remedy was awarded.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race discrimination | Original ET1 pleaded direct race discrimination arising from the 18 September 2018 bus incident. The tribunal dismissed the complaint because it was presented out of time and did not extend time on a just and equitable basis. The later amendment application to add race discrimination in grievance handling and investigation was refused. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Harassment | The original claim also pleaded harassment on grounds of race. The tribunal dismissed the claim with the race discrimination complaint because the ET1 was out of time and the tribunal had no jurisdiction to entertain it. | Dismissed | Race | — |
Legal tests applied
8 references- s123 Equality Act 2010
- Selkent Bus Company v Moore
- Hendricks v Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis
- Robertson v Bexley Community Centre
- British Coal Corporation v Keeble
- London Borough of Southwark v Afolabi
- Chandhok v Tirkey
- Pontoon v Shinh
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.