Case 1300856/2021 · Employment Tribunal
In Person v Respondent — 2022
- Case reference
- 1300856/2021
- Decision date
- 11 August 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Wedderspoon Members
- Panel members
- Mr R White, Mr J Reeves
Parties
1 namedClaimant
In Person
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal sat at Birmingham on 8, 9, 10 and 11 August 2022 before Employment Judge Wedderspoon with lay members Mr R White and Mr J Reeves. The claimant, Mr Ahmed Abdi, appeared in person and the respondent was represented by Ms R. Jones, Counsel.
In its unanimous judgment of 11 August 2022, the tribunal dismissed each of the claims before it. It held that the claimant’s complaint of unfair dismissal was not well founded, and it reached the same conclusion on the wrongful dismissal complaint.
The tribunal also dismissed the discrimination claims. It found that the direct race discrimination claim was not well founded, the direct religious discrimination claim was not well founded, the harassment claim related to race was not well founded, and the harassment claim related to religion was not well founded. The victimisation complaint was also dismissed as not well founded.
No monetary award was recorded in the judgment text provided.
Claims and outcomes
7 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal held the complaint was not well founded. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Wrongful dismissal | The tribunal held the complaint was not well founded. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Race discrimination | Direct race discrimination was held not well founded. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Religion or belief discrimination | Direct religious discrimination was held not well founded. | Dismissed | Religion or belief | — |
| Harassment | Harassment related to race was held not well founded. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Harassment | Harassment related to religion was held not well founded. | Dismissed | Religion or belief | — |
| Victimisation | The victimisation complaint was held not well founded. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.