Case 1300907/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr R Bhagwan v Currys plc — 2024
- Case reference
- 1300907/2021
- Decision date
- 22 March 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Maxwell
- Venue
- Birmingham
- Panel members
- Mrs Rance, Ms Wilkinson
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr R Bhagwan
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal heard claims by Mr R Bhagwan against Currys Group Limited at Birmingham on 20, 21 and 22 March 2024, before Employment Judge Maxwell, Mrs Rance and Ms Wilkinson.
The judgment records that the claimant's unfair dismissal claim was not well-founded and was dismissed. It also records that the direct discrimination claims because of race and because of religious belief were not well-founded and were dismissed.
No remedy or monetary award was made in the judgment text supplied.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states the unfair dismissal claim was not well-founded and was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Race discrimination | The judgment states the direct discrimination claim because of race was not well-founded and was dismissed. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Religion or belief discrimination | The judgment states the direct discrimination claim because of religious belief was not well-founded and was dismissed. | Dismissed | Religion or belief | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.