Case 1300933/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Syed Hashmi v DHL Services Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 1300933/2021
- Decision date
- 9 June 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Edmonds Representation
- Venue
- Birmingham
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Syed Hashmi
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal refused the claimant permission to amend his claim to include allegations of race discrimination and allegations of discrimination on the grounds of religion or belief.
The judgment records that the claimant's claims for discrimination on the grounds of race and religion or belief were dismissed. It also states that the remainder of the claimant's claims were unaffected and remained listed for hearing from 24 to 27 January 2023.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race discrimination | The claimant was refused permission to amend his claim to include allegations of race discrimination, and the judgment states that claims for discrimination on the grounds of race were dismissed. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Religion or belief discrimination | The claimant was refused permission to amend his claim to include allegations of discrimination on the grounds of religion or belief, and the judgment states that claims for discrimination on the grounds of religion or belief were dismissed. | Dismissed | Religion or belief | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.