Ms L Begum v Asda Stores Limited — 2026

Case reference: 1301059/2019
Decision date: 30 April 2026
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Woffenden

Indexed: 19 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Ms L Begum

Respondent

Asda Stores Limited

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

The judgment records that the claimant, Ms L Begum, brought proceedings against Asda Stores Limited. It does not set out factual allegations or findings on the merits.

Employment Judge Woffenden dismissed the proceedings following withdrawal of the claim by the claimant. No remedy was awarded and no monetary figures are stated.

Claims and outcomes

4 findings recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Breach of contract	The judgment states that the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal of the claim by the claimant; the claim type is taken from the listing category.	Withdrawn	—	—
Disability discrimination	The judgment states that the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal of the claim by the claimant; the claim type is taken from the listing category.	Withdrawn	Disability	—
Whistleblowing	The judgment states that the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal of the claim by the claimant; the claim type is taken from the listing category for public interest disclosure.	Withdrawn	—	—
Unfair dismissal	The judgment states that the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal of the claim by the claimant; the claim type is taken from the listing category.	Withdrawn	—	—

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Open official judgment PDF on gov.uk

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.