Employment tribunal cases against Asda Stores Limited

Since 2017, Asda Stores Limited has appeared as a respondent in 225 employment tribunal cases, with £4,493 in total awards recorded against the employer.

Companies House number: 00464777
Status: Active
SIC codes: 47190

Total cases: 225
Total awarded against: £4,493
Largest award: £4,493
Most common claim: Unfair dismissal

Indexed: 5 May 2026

Cases by claim type

18 distinct categories

#	Claim type	Cases
01	Unfair dismissal	152
02	Disability discrimination	78
03	Unlawful deduction from wages	76
04	Breach of contract	46
05	Working time regulations	33
06	Race discrimination	29
07	Sex discrimination	23
08	Whistleblowing	19
09	Age discrimination	11
10	Redundancy	9
11	Other	8
12	Sexual orientation discrimination	6
13	Victimisation	6
14	Pregnancy and maternity discrimination	6
15	Religion or belief discrimination

All cases

225 cases · chronological

Case ref.	Decided	Jurisdiction	Claimant	Claim types	Award
1301059/2019	30 April 2026	England & Wales	Ms L Begum	Breach of contract, Disability discrimination, Whistleblowing, Unfair dismissal	—
2500814/2019	30 April 2026	England & Wales	Mr S Devon	Breach of contract, Other, Whistleblowing, Unfair dismissal, Unlawful deduction from wages	—
1808212/2018	30 April 2026	England & Wales	Ms R Self	Redundancy, Unfair dismissal, Unlawful deduction from wages	—
2503672/2019	30 April 2026	England & Wales	Mrs A Burn	Breach of contract, Unfair dismissal	—
3332233/2018	30 April 2026	England & Wales	Mr R Bangher	Disability discrimination, Unfair dismissal	—
1303430/2019	30 April 2026	England & Wales	Mrs AK Gill	Sex discrimination, Unfair dismissal	—
2600566/2019	29 April 2026	England & Wales	Mr. S Yousif	Disability discrimination, Unfair dismissal	—
2600788/2019	27 April 2026	England & Wales	Mr. J L Frost	Disability discrimination	—
1301231/2019

Methodology

Data extracted from published employment tribunal judgments on gov.uk. Case reference, decision date, judge, venue and claim categories come from structured metadata. Claimant and respondent names are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Outcomes and compensation are not yet populated for every case — see how the data is built.