Case 6031157/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Anthony v Asda Stores Limited — 2026
- Case reference
- 6031157/2025
- Decision date
- 17 August 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Shepherd Members
- Venue
- Leeds
- Panel members
- Mr Taj, Mr Wilks
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S Anthony
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal unanimously found Mr Anthony's claims of direct race discrimination and harassment related to race not well-founded and dismissed them. It also found the claims of sexual harassment and harassment related to sex not well-founded and dismissed them.
The victimisation claim and the claim of detriment on the ground that Mr Anthony had made a protected disclosure were not well-founded and were dismissed. The constructive unfair dismissal claim was also not well-founded and was dismissed. The judgment states these outcomes without further factual findings or legal reasoning.
The unauthorised deduction from wages claim was dismissed following a settlement through ACAS. The stand-alone third-party harassment complaint was dismissed upon withdrawal. No monetary remedy was recorded.
Claims and outcomes
9 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race discrimination | Direct race discrimination. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Harassment | Harassment related to race. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Harassment | Sexual harassment; the judgment does not assign a protected characteristic to this complaint. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Harassment | Harassment related to sex. | Dismissed | Sex | — |
| Victimisation | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Whistleblowing | Detriment on the ground that the claimant had made a protected disclosure. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Constructive dismissal | Constructive unfair dismissal. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.