Case 2301800/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr. C. S. Goh v Asda Stores Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 2301800/2024
- Decision date
- 25 April 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Sudra
- Venue
- London South
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr. C. S. Goh
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the London South Employment Tribunal on 25 April 2025, Employment Judge Sudra, sitting alone, struck out Mr C. S. Goh's claim against Asda Stores Limited. The judgment states that the claim was submitted out of time and that the Tribunal did not have jurisdiction to hear it.
The extracted judgment does not record any substantive determination of the merits, any findings of fact on the underlying dispute, or any monetary award. It also does not specify the legal cause of action in the text provided, so the outcome is recorded only as a struck-out claim.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The extracted judgment does not identify the underlying cause of action. It states only that the Claimant's claim was struck out because it was submitted out of time and the Tribunal did not have jurisdiction to hear it. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.