Case 1301095/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs G Hunjan v The University Of Birmingham — 2020
- Case reference
- 1301095/2019
- Decision date
- 20 January 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Butler
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs G Hunjan
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningSettlement terms were agreed between Mrs G Hunjan and the University of Birmingham, and the tribunal recorded that all claims were dismissed upon withdrawal under rule 52. The extracted judgment does not set out any substantive findings on liability, remedy, or the factual basis of the claims.
The decision was issued by Employment Judge Butler on 20 January 2020. No lay members are listed in the extracted text, and no monetary award is recorded.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Settlement terms having been agreed, this claim was dismissed upon withdrawal. No substantive determination is recorded in the extracted text. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Race discrimination | Settlement terms having been agreed, this claim was dismissed upon withdrawal. No substantive determination is recorded in the extracted text. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Redundancy | Settlement terms having been agreed, this claim was dismissed upon withdrawal. No substantive determination is recorded in the extracted text. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | Settlement terms having been agreed, this claim was dismissed upon withdrawal. No substantive determination is recorded in the extracted text. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Working time regulations | Settlement terms having been agreed, this claim was dismissed upon withdrawal. No substantive determination is recorded in the extracted text. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.