Case 1301103/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mr R Lynch & Others (see attached schedule) v Carillion Services Limited (In Compulsory Liquidation) — 2021
- Case reference
- 1301103/2018
- Decision date
- 16 September 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Franey
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr R Lynch & Others (see attached schedule)
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal wrote to the self-represented claimants on 20 July 2021 asking for confirmation that the claims were to be pursued. The claimants named in the attached schedule did not reply.
By a further letter dated 31 August 2021, the tribunal gave those claimants an opportunity to make representations, or request a hearing, on why the claims should not be struck out for not being actively pursued. None of the claimants replied to that letter, made any representations, or requested a hearing.
Regional Employment Judge Franey therefore held that the claims had not been actively pursued and struck them out on 16 September 2021. The judgment records no substantive findings on the merits and no monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Inferred from the case listing as the protective award claim; the extracted judgment itself does not separate the strike-out by claim type and only records that the claims were not actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
| Redundancy | Inferred from the case listing as the redundancy claim; the extracted judgment itself does not separate the strike-out by claim type and only records that the claims were not actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.