Case 1301279/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Ms Bialczak 1301279/2022 & 1301314/2022 Second Claimant: Mrs M Piegza 1301280/2022 & 1301313/2022 Third Claimant: Miss A Zmudzinska 1303075/2022 & 1303132/2022 Fourth Claimant: Mr L Cymermann 1303076/2022 & 1303131/2022
At the hearing before Employment Judge Childe on 6 June 2023, the first and second claimants did not attend. Their claims in case numbers 1301279/2022, 1301314/2022, 1301280/2022 and 1301313/2022 were dismissed under rule 47 for non-attendance. The third claimant's complaint in case number 1303132/2022 and the fourth claimant's complaint in case number 1303076/2022 were dismissed on withdrawal under rule 52.
The third claimant's remaining claims in case number 1303075/2022 succeeded. The tribunal found that the respondent had failed to pay £975 gross for the period 30 May 2022 to 17 June 2022, and it ordered payment of that sum. It also found that accrued holiday pay was due on termination and ordered payment of £1,001 gross, representing 7.5 days' holiday pay.
The fourth claimant's remaining claims in case number 1303131/2022 also succeeded. The tribunal found that the respondent had failed to pay £1,109.85 gross for the period 30 May 2022 to 17 June 2022, and it ordered payment of that sum. It further ordered £936 net for accrued holiday pay on termination, representing 10.5 days' holiday pay. The total monetary award recorded by the judgment is £4,021.85.
This case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The first claimant's claims in case numbers 1301279/2022 and 1301314/2022 were dismissed under rule 47 because she did not attend the hearing. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Other | The second claimant's claims in case numbers 1301280/2022 and 1301313/2022 were dismissed under rule 47 because she did not attend the hearing. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Other | The third claimant's complaint in case number 1303132/2022 was dismissed on withdrawal under rule 52. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Other | The fourth claimant's complaint in case number 1303076/2022 was dismissed on withdrawal under rule 52. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Third claimant, case number 1303075/2022: unpaid wages for the period 30 May 2022 to 17 June 2022, ordered to be paid as £975 gross. | Upheld | — | £975 |
| Holiday pay | Third claimant, case number 1303075/2022: accrued holiday pay on termination, ordered to be paid as £1,001 gross, representing 7.5 days' holiday pay. | Upheld | — | £1,001 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Fourth claimant, case number 1303131/2022: unpaid wages for the period 30 May 2022 to 17 June 2022, ordered to be paid as £1,109.85 gross. | Upheld | — | £1,110 |
| Holiday pay | Fourth claimant, case number 1303131/2022: accrued holiday pay on termination, ordered to be paid as £936 net, representing 10.5 days' holiday pay. | Upheld | — | £936 |
The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.