Case 1301425/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Pirvu v Amazon UK Services Limited RECORD OF A PRIVATE PRELIMINARY HEARING — 2024
- Case reference
- 1301425/2023
- Decision date
- 23 July 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Faulkner Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S Pirvu
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a record of a private preliminary hearing dealing with case management and amendment issues before a listed final hearing. Employment Judge Faulkner considered the claimant's correspondence and amendment application, and applied amendment case law to decide which matters could proceed as part of the pleaded case.
The order records that some proposed additions or clarifications were allowed or reflected in the revised list of issues, while at least one proposed amendment about written warnings in December 2022 was not permitted. The live issues listed for final hearing included direct age discrimination, harassment related to age, and victimisation; the order did not decide whether those complaints succeeded.
No remedy was awarded in this order. Remedy questions, including financial loss, injury to feelings, personal injury, ACAS uplift or reduction, recommendations, and interest, were listed as issues for the final hearing if liability were established.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age discrimination | The order records direct age discrimination complaints in the list of issues for a final hearing. It does not determine liability. | Other | Age | — |
| Harassment | The order records harassment related to age in the list of issues for a final hearing. It does not determine liability. | Other | Age | — |
| Victimisation | The order records victimisation issues for a final hearing. It does not determine liability. | Other | — | — |
Legal tests applied
8 references- Selkent Bus Co Ltd v Moore [1996] ICR 836
- Vaughan v Modality Partnership [2021] ICR 535
- Galilee v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis [2018] ICR 634
- Reuters Ltd v Cole UKEAT/0258/17
- Equality Act 2010 section 13
- Equality Act 2010 section 26
- Equality Act 2010 section 27
- ACAS Code of Practice on Disciplinary and Grievance Procedures
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 4 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.