Case 1301578/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Ross Mansion v Change Hospitality Hub Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 1301578/2023
- Decision date
- 6 July 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Bennett Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Ross Mansion
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at Birmingham by Cloud Video Platform on 6 July 2023 before Employment Judge Bennett. The respondent did not attend. The tribunal found that the respondent failed to give the claimant a pay statement in accordance with s8 Employment Rights Act 1996 for 31 weeks of employment. No separate monetary sum was attached to that finding in the judgment.
The tribunal also upheld the claimant's complaint of unnotified deductions from pay and ordered payment of £474.70 gross. That sum was the difference between the total payment for the hours worked and the net pay paid into the claimant's bank account for the 13 weeks immediately before the employment tribunal claim. It further ordered £415.81 gross for accrued but unpaid holiday pay covering the period from 5 April 2022 to 28 June 2022.
The claimant's complaints under the Agency Workers Regulations 2010 succeeded on both hourly pay and annual leave entitlement. The tribunal awarded £588.77 gross for the hourly pay differential for the period 28 June 2022 to 23 December 2022, and £1,038.14 gross for annual leave entitlement due for the period 29 June 2022 to 23 December 2022. It also awarded £50 gross for miscellaneous loss attributable to the infringement.
The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay the claimant £946 for preparation time costs, calculated at £43 per hour for 22 hours. The total award recorded in the judgment was £3,513.42 gross.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Failure to give a pay statement in accordance with s8 Employment Rights Act 1996 for 31 weeks of employment; no separate monetary sum was recorded for this finding. | Upheld | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Awarded for the difference between total payment for hours worked and net pay into the claimant's bank account for the 13 weeks immediately before the claim. | Upheld | — | £475 |
| Holiday pay | Awarded for accrued but unpaid holiday pay for the period 5 April 2022 to 28 June 2022. | Upheld | — | £416 |
| Agency worker regulations | Equal hourly pay complaint under the Agency Workers Regulations 2010; the award reflected the hourly pay differential between 28 June 2022 and 23 December 2022. | Upheld | — | £589 |
| Agency worker regulations | Annual leave entitlement complaint under the Agency Workers Regulations 2010; the award reflected leave due between 29 June 2022 and 23 December 2022. | Upheld | — | £1,038 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,513
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.