Case 1301698/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Cox v DL Insurance Services Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 1301698/2023
- Decision date
- 26 January 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Edmonds
- Panel members
- Mr S Woodall, Ms M Stewart
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D Cox
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal found that the complaint of unfavourable treatment because of something arising in consequence of disability was well-founded in one respect: the respondent's failure to provide the claimant with a replacement device/tablet between 7 October 2022 and 14 November 2022. The remaining complaints under that head were dismissed.
The Tribunal also found that the complaint of failure to make reasonable adjustments for disability was well-founded in relation to a permanent reduction in work volumes. The remaining reasonable adjustments complaints were dismissed.
The complaint of harassment related to disability was dismissed. Remedy was not determined in this judgment; a separate remedy hearing was to be listed, with directions for schedules of loss and related matters.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Complaint of unfavourable treatment because of something arising in consequence of disability succeeded in relation to the failure to provide the claimant with a replacement device/tablet between 7 October 2022 and 14 November 2022. | Upheld | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | Complaint of failure to make reasonable adjustments for disability succeeded in relation to a permanent reduction in work volumes. | Upheld | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | Remaining complaints of unfavourable treatment because of something arising in consequence of disability and remaining complaints of failure to make reasonable adjustments for disability were dismissed. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Harassment | Complaint of harassment related to disability was dismissed. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.