Case 1301937/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs C Nicholls v Boogie Bounce Xtreme Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 1301937/2019
- Decision date
- 18 August 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Flood
- Venue
- Birmingham
- Panel members
- Mrs Ellis, Dr Hammersley
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs C Nicholls
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment records that Mrs C Nicholls brought complaints against Boogie Bounce Xtreme Limited of pregnancy and maternity discrimination under s18 Equality Act 2010, harassment related to pregnancy and maternity under s26 Equality Act 2010, unlawful detriment for reasons relating to pregnancy, childbirth or maternity under s47C Employment Rights Act 1996, automatically unfair dismissal under s99 Employment Rights Act 1996, and unlawful deduction from wages under s13 Employment Rights Act 1996. The matter was heard at Birmingham before Employment Judge Flood sitting with Mrs Ellis and Dr Hammersley, with hearings listed on 15-19 June 2021 and 18 August 2021.
The provided judgment text contains the tribunal's final order only. It states that all of the complaints were not well founded and were dismissed. No monetary award or separate remedy assessment is recorded in the supplied text.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pregnancy and maternity discrimination | Complaint under s18 Equality Act 2010. | Dismissed | Pregnancy and maternity | — |
| Harassment | Harassment related to pregnancy and maternity under s26 Equality Act 2010. | Dismissed | Pregnancy and maternity | — |
| Other | Unlawful detriment for reasons relating to pregnancy, childbirth or maternity under s47C Employment Rights Act 1996. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | Automatically unfair dismissal for reasons of pregnancy, childbirth or maternity under s99 Employment Rights Act 1996. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Complaint under s13 Employment Rights Act 1996. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.