Case 1301973/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr I Ojo v Mrs D Oliver, Solicitor — 2021
- Case reference
- 1301973/2019
- Decision date
- 6 December 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Meichen
- Panel members
- Mr KW Hutchinson, Ms WA Stewart
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr I Ojo
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal heard the case at Birmingham on 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 8 and 24 November 2021 in a hybrid hearing before Employment Judge Meichen, Mr KW Hutchinson and Ms WA Stewart. The claimant, Mr I Ojo, appeared in person and the respondent, Fine Futures Ltd, was represented by counsel.
The tribunal held that all of the claimant’s claims failed and were dismissed. Those claims were direct race discrimination, harassment related to race, victimisation, unfair dismissal and wrongful dismissal.
The written record states that reasons for judgment were given orally at the hearing, and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested in accordance with the tribunal’s directions. No monetary remedy was awarded.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race discrimination | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Harassment | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Victimisation | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Unfair dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Wrongful dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.