Case 1302152/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr. J. Shaw v Dr. Thamber Sabartnam Ravindran, Mrs. Niranjala Ravindran & Dr. Roshan Ravindran Trading as East Park Medical Practice — 2025
- Case reference
- 1302152/2023
- Decision date
- 31 January 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Wedderspoon Members
- Venue
- Birmingham
- Panel members
- Mrs BH Astill, Mr P Tsouvallaris
Parties
2 namedKey findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal, sitting at Birmingham over five days in January 2025 before Employment Judge Wedderspoon and two lay members, considered claims by Mr J Shaw against the partners trading as East Park Medical Practice. It found the claim of constructive unfair dismissal well founded, together with claims of failure to make reasonable adjustments, discrimination arising from disability, and victimisation.
The claim of harassment related to disability was not well founded and was dismissed, and the complaint regarding failure to provide particulars of employment was held to be out of time and accordingly failed.
The claimant was awarded a total sum of £16,942.40, comprising an injury to feelings award of £10,000, interest of £2,347.40, a basic award of £3,150, loss of earnings of £945, and loss of statutory rights of £500. The brief judgment text does not record detailed reasoning or legal tests.
Claims and outcomes
6 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Constructive dismissal | Tribunal found the claim of constructive unfair dismissal well founded. Award not split per claim in the judgment text. | Upheld | — | — |
| Harassment | Harassment related to disability was not well founded and was dismissed. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | Failure to make reasonable adjustments — well founded and succeeds. Award not split per claim in the judgment text. | Upheld | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | Discrimination arising from disability — well founded and succeeds. Award not split per claim in the judgment text. | Upheld | Disability | — |
| Victimisation | Victimisation claim well founded and succeeds. Award not split per claim in the judgment text. | Upheld | — | — |
| Other | Claim for failure to provide particulars of employment was out of time and fails. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £16,942
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £3,150
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £1,445
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.