Case 1302198/2022 · Employment Tribunal
MR LINTON EZRON DUQUESNAY v Evetec Aluminium Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 1302198/2022
- Decision date
- 28 September 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ali Members
- Panel members
- Mrs M Gola, Mr T Liburd
Parties
2 namedClaimant
MR LINTON EZRON DUQUESNAY
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal heard the claim in person at Midlands West ET on 25 to 28 September 2023 before Employment Judge Ali, with lay members Mrs M Gola and Mr T Liburd. The claimant appeared in person and the respondent was represented by counsel.
The tribunal dismissed the claimant's complaint of direct race discrimination. It also found that the claimant's various complaints of harassment related to race succeeded in part and were dismissed in part.
The tribunal awarded damages in the total sum of £14,160. That award was made up of £12,000 for injury to feelings and £2,160 interest. No separate basic award or compensatory award is recorded in the judgment extract.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race discrimination | The tribunal dismissed the complaint of direct race discrimination. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Harassment | The claimant's complaints of harassment related to race succeeded in part and were dismissed in part. The tribunal awarded £14,160, made up of £12,000 for injury to feelings and £2,160 interest. | Other | Race | £14,160 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £14,160
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.