Case 1302210/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mr P Duddy & Others (see attached schedule) v Carillion Services Limited (In Compulsory Liquidation) — 2020
- Case reference
- 1302210/2018
- Decision date
- 22 October 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Franey
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr P Duddy & Others (see attached schedule)
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal issued a strike out judgment under rule 37. It recorded that by letters dated either 24 August 2020 or 2 October 2020, the claimants were given an opportunity to explain why their claims should not be struck out because they had not been actively pursued.
The claimants did not make written representations and did not request a hearing. On that basis, Regional Employment Judge Franey struck out the claims on 22 October 2020. The extracted judgment does not record any substantive determination on liability or any monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Mapped from the case listing as a protective award claim; the extracted judgment text itself only states that the claims were struck out under rule 37 for not being actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
| Redundancy | Mapped from the case listing; the extracted judgment text does not identify the underlying claim type beyond referring to the claims collectively. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.