Case 1302247/2022 · Employment Tribunal

Miss C Oliver v Walsall Metropolitan Borough Council — 2022

Case reference: 1302247/2022
Decision date: 13 December 2022
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Britton Appearances
Venue: in private

Indexed: 21 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Miss C Oliver

Respondent

Walsall Metropolitan Borough Council

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

The tribunal heard the matter in private by telephone on 13 December 2022 before Employment Judge Britton. The claimant appeared in person and the respondent was represented by Mr Abdulla, solicitor.

The tribunal dismissed the claimant's complaints of sex discrimination and of unpaid holiday pay/unlawful deduction from wages following withdrawal by the claimant. The judgment does not record any findings on the merits of those complaints, any remedy, or any legal test applied.

The claimant's remaining claim of maternity discrimination was not determined in this judgment and was listed to proceed to a hearing on 25-27 September 2023.

Claims and outcomes

3 findings recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Sex discrimination	The complaint of sex discrimination was dismissed following a withdrawal by the claimant.	Withdrawn	Sex	—
Holiday pay	The complaint in relation to unpaid holiday pay was dismissed following a withdrawal by the claimant.	Withdrawn	—	—
Unlawful deduction from wages	The complaint in relation to unlawful deduction from wages was dismissed following a withdrawal by the claimant.	Withdrawn	—	—

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.