Case 1302259/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Ms T Khan v The Secretary of State for Justice — 2022
- Case reference
- 1302259/2022
- Decision date
- 5 December 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Britton Appearances
- Venue
- by telephone
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms T Khan
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a preliminary hearing by telephone on 22 November 2022, the claimant withdrew complaints of direct discrimination on the grounds of age and religion/belief, breach of contract, notice pay, and harassment related to protected characteristics under the Equality Act 2010. Employment Judge Britton dismissed those complaints following the withdrawal.
The judgment did not determine the merits of the remaining claims. It recorded that the claimant's remaining claims would proceed to a hearing listed for 12-14 July 2023 and 17-20 July 2023.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age discrimination | The judgment states that the complaint of direct discrimination on grounds of age was dismissed following withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | Age | — |
| Religion or belief discrimination | The judgment states that the complaint of direct discrimination on grounds of religion/belief was dismissed following withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | Religion or belief | — |
| Breach of contract | The judgment states that the breach of contract complaint was dismissed following withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Wrongful dismissal | The judgment refers to notice pay being dismissed following withdrawal by the claimant; this is classified as wrongful dismissal but the precise pleading is not further described. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Harassment | The judgment states that harassment related to protected characteristics under the Equality Act 2010 was dismissed following withdrawal by the claimant, but does not identify the specific protected characteristic or characteristics for the harassment complaint. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.