Case 1302547/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mr I Wood v Ringway Infrastructure Services Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 1302547/2018
- Decision date
- 20 August 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Miller Representation
- Venue
- Birmingham
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr I Wood
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt Birmingham on 19 and 20 August 2019, Employment Judge Miller found Mr I Wood's unfair dismissal claim against Ringway Infrastructure Services Ltd to be well founded. The written record states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that no written reasons would be provided unless requested.
The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay £1,107.97. The judgment sets out a basic award calculated from 17.5 x £508, giving £8,890 before a 90% reduction for contribution and an awarded basic award of £889. It also sets out a compensatory award calculated from four weeks at £549.93 plus £350 for loss of statutory rights, giving £1,839.72 before a 90% reduction for contribution and an awarded compensatory award of £218.97.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £1,108 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,108
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £889
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £219
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.