Case 1302716/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr K Jones v FedEx Express UK Transportation Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 1302716/2024
- Decision date
- 27 March 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Novice REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr K Jones
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a preliminary hearing in public on 27 March 2025, the Tribunal considered the time limit issue in Mr K Jones's claim against Fedex Express UK Transportation Limited. The judgment records under the heading "Just and equitable time limit: claim out of time" that the claim was not presented within the applicable time limit.
The Tribunal found that it was not just and equitable to extend the time limit. The claim was therefore dismissed. No remedy was awarded or considered in the written judgment, and the judgment records that reasons were given orally with written reasons only to be provided if requested within the stated time.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The judgment records that the claim was not presented within the applicable time limit and that it was not just and equitable to extend time. The PDF text does not set out the underlying allegations beyond the source listing category of Disability Discrimination. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- just and equitable time limit
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.