Case 1302864/2022 · Employment Tribunal

MS. HAS NAZIR v The Commissioners for His Majesty’s Revenue & Customs — 2023

Case reference: 1302864/2022
Decision date: 17 October 2023
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge N. Clarke Appearances
Venue: By CVP

Indexed: 19 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

MS. HAS NAZIR

Respondent

The Commissioners for His Majesty’s Revenue & Customs

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

This was a preliminary hearing to consider disability status and consequential issues, amendment applications, strike out, deposit orders and further case management. The tribunal treated the Claimant's email of 14 June 2022 as part of the original pleading where appropriate and considered whether later allegations required permission to amend.

The tribunal made deposit orders of £250 each for three harassment related to age allegations concerning LI, EP and NA. It held that, although those claims did not have no reasonable prospect of success, they faced significant difficulties, including the distinction between age and maturity and the need to establish a link with age.

The tribunal allowed the harassment related to disability claim about the occupational health report to proceed, allowed the indirect race discrimination claim about hotel breakfast arrangements to proceed, and allowed part of the discrimination arising from disability amendment relating to three 2022 matters. It refused or dismissed the remaining amendments and struck out older or weak allegations, including the direct race discrimination taxi allegation, two age harassment allegations from 2019 and 2020, and direct disability discrimination allegations relying on stress.

Claims and outcomes

12 findings recorded

This case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Harassment	Allegation A was permitted to proceed only if the Claimant paid a £250 deposit; the tribunal found it had little reasonable prospect of success but did not strike it out at this hearing.	Other	Age	—
Harassment	Allegation B was allowed as an amendment but made subject to a £250 deposit order because the tribunal found it had little reasonable prospect of success.	Other	Age	—
Harassment	Allegation C, concerning an occupational health report and workplace adjustment discussion, was allowed to proceed; strike out or deposit order was refused.	Other	Disability	—
Race discrimination	Allegation D, direct race discrimination concerning use of the Claimant's former name, was refused as an amendment and dismissed.	Dismissed	Race	—
Race discrimination	Allegation E, indirect race discrimination concerning hotel bookings with bed and breakfast, was allowed to proceed; strike out or deposit order was refused.	Other	Race	—
Harassment	Allegation F was permitted to proceed only if the Claimant paid a £250 deposit; the tribunal found it had little reasonable prospect of success.

Legal tests applied

14 references

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Open official judgment PDF on gov.uk

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.