Case 1303044/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Miss G McPherson v Birmingham City Council — 2019
- Case reference
- 1303044/2018
- Decision date
- 27 June 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Richardson
- Venue
- Birmingham
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss G McPherson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment concerned a preliminary hearing on the respondent's application to strike out the claimant's first claim, or for a deposit order, and the claimant's application to amend her claims. The first claim, 1303044/2018, contained disability discrimination complaints arising during employment before the claimant resigned. An earlier judgment had found the claimant to be disabled only in respect of certain impairments and only from January 2019 or March 2019, after the first claim was presented on 11 June 2018.
Judge Doyle declined to defer the strike-out decision pending the claimant's appeal against the earlier disability-status judgment. Applying that earlier judgment, he concluded that the first claim had no reasonable prospect of success because the statutory basis for a disability discrimination claim was not made out for the relevant period. The first claim, including the section 26 harassment amendment, was struck out.
The claimant's applications to add associative disability discrimination, further disability-related harassment or direct discrimination, and equal pay complaints were refused. The tribunal found the proposed carer-related complaint was not framed as less favourable treatment because of another person's disability and that the further disability-related complaint was undermined by the earlier disability-status finding. The proposed equal pay complaint was treated as a new, poorly pleaded claim, advanced late and out of time in the tribunal, with the claimant retaining the possibility of bringing such a claim in another court with a longer limitation period.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The first claim, as amended, contained disability discrimination complaints only and was struck out as having no reasonable prospect of success. The tribunal relied on the earlier finding that the claimant was not a disabled person at the time of the events in the first claim or when it was presented on 11 June 2018. | Struck out | Disability | — |
| Harassment | The first claim had been amended to include a complaint of disability-related harassment under section 26 of the Equality Act 2010. It was struck out with the rest of the first claim for the same reason. | Struck out | Disability | — |
| Equal pay | The claimant's application to amend to add an equal pay complaint was refused. The tribunal described the proposed amendment as very poorly pleaded, an entirely new complaint, out of time in the tribunal, and one for which there was no proper basis to extend time. | Other | — | — |
Legal tests applied
6 references- Anyanwu v South Bank Student Union
- Ezsias v North Glamorgan NHS Trust
- A v B
- Selkent Bus Co v Moore
- Hainsworth v Ministry of Defence
- CHEZ Razpredelenie Bulgaria
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.