Case 1303057/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Ms R Riscau v Wye Valley NHS Trust and 1 other — 2025
- Case reference
- 1303057/2024
- Decision date
- 29 September 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Camp
- Venue
- Birmingham
- Panel members
- Miss SP Outwin, Mr PA Kennedy
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Ms R Riscau
Respondents
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe final hearing took place at Birmingham on 22 to 26 and 29 September 2025 before Employment Judge Camp, with lay members Miss SP Outwin and Mr PA Kennedy. Ms R Riscau appeared in person and the respondents were represented by Mr S Peacock, solicitor.
The tribunal recorded that the claimant's entire claim consisted of complaints of direct sex discrimination, sex-related harassment and victimisation. It found that the entire claim failed and was dismissed.
Reasons were given orally at the hearing. The written decision states that written reasons would not be provided unless requested in writing within 14 days of the sending of the record of decision.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sex discrimination | Direct sex discrimination was part of the claimant's entire claim and was dismissed. | Dismissed | Sex | — |
| Harassment | Sex-related harassment was part of the claimant's entire claim and was dismissed. | Dismissed | Sex | — |
| Victimisation | The judgment dismissed the claimant's victimisation complaint as part of the entire claim. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.