Case 1303149/2021 · Employment Tribunal
In Person For the v Respondent — 2023
- Case reference
- 1303149/2021
- Decision date
- 15 May 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Gaskell
- Panel members
- Ms W Ellis, Mr J Sharma
Parties
1 namedClaimant
In Person For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe unanimous tribunal at Birmingham dismissed all claims. It found that the claimant was not dismissed by the respondent, so the unfair dismissal and wrongful dismissal claims failed, and it also dismissed the breach of contract claim.
On the Equality Act complaints, the tribunal recorded no contravention of sections 39 or 40. It dismissed the claimant's complaints of direct disability discrimination, discrimination arising from disability, indirect disability discrimination, failure to make adjustments, victimisation, and harassment. The protected disclosure detriment claim, the unpaid annual leave claim under Regulation 13A of the Working Time Regulations, and the unlawful deductions from wages claim were also dismissed. No monetary award was made.
Claims and outcomes
9 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal found the claimant was not dismissed by the respondent. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Wrongful dismissal | The tribunal found the claimant was not dismissed by the respondent. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | Dismissed under section 39 of the Equality Act 2010; the tribunal rejected the complaints of direct disability discrimination, discrimination arising from disability, indirect disability discrimination, and failure to make adjustments. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Victimisation | The judgment dismisses the victimisation complaint alongside the disability discrimination complaints. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Harassment | Dismissed under section 40 of the Equality Act 2010. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Whistleblowing | Claim for protected disclosure detriment dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Claim for unpaid annual leave under Regulation 13A of the Working Time Regulations dismissed. |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.