Case 1303199/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Miss Z Frazer v Advance Health Care UK Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 1303199/2022
- Decision date
- 8 September 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Noons
- Venue
- Birmingham
- Panel members
- Mr Davis, Mr Virdee
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss Z Frazer
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal sat at Birmingham via CVP on 6, 7 and 8 September 2023 before Employment Judge Noons with Mr Davis and Mr Virdee as members. The claimant was Miss Z Frazer and the respondent was Advance Health Care UK Limited.
In the written judgment the tribunal recorded that the claimant's claim for harassment failed and was dismissed. It also recorded that the claimant's claim for direct discrimination failed and was dismissed.
The written record does not set out the tribunal's reasons, the protected characteristic relied on for the direct discrimination claim, or any remedy. The note states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Harassment | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Other | The judgment records a dismissed claim for direct discrimination, but the extracted text does not specify the protected characteristic or any further particulars. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.