Case 1303248/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr G.S. Banger v Wildings Solicitors LLP — 2023
- Case reference
- 1303248/2022
- Decision date
- 21 December 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Robin Broughton
- Venue
- Birmingham
- Panel members
- Mr K. Hutchinson, Mr J. Reeves
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr G.S. Banger
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr G.S. Banger’s claims against Wildings Solicitors LLP were heard at Birmingham on 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10 November 2023, with a further hearing on 21 December 2023 before Employment Judge Robin Broughton and members Mr K. Hutchinson and Mr J. Reeves. The judgment records claims for direct discrimination because of race and/or religion, indirect religious belief discrimination, harassment related to religion and/or race, and victimisation.
The tribunal’s decision of 21 December 2023 is that all of those claims failed and were dismissed. The extracted judgment does not record any monetary award or other remedy.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race discrimination | Direct discrimination because of race and/or religion; dismissed. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Religion or belief discrimination | Indirect religious belief discrimination; dismissed. | Dismissed | Religion or belief | — |
| Harassment | Harassment related to religion and/or race; dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Victimisation | Victimisation; dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.