Case 1303374/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Miss Olivia Davis v Allianz Management Services Limited and 2 others — 2024
- Case reference
- 1303374/2023
- Decision date
- 14 February 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Power
Parties
4 namedClaimant
Miss Olivia Davis
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal considered only the claimant's unfair dismissal complaint. It recorded that section 108 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 requires not less than two years' service to bring such a complaint, and found that Miss Olivia Davis had been employed for less than two years.
On that basis, the tribunal held that she was not entitled to bring an unfair dismissal claim. It also found that, despite being given the opportunity, the claimant did not provide an acceptable reason why the complaint should not be struck out.
The unfair dismissal complaint was therefore struck out. The judgment expressly states that the claimant's other complaints were not affected by this decision.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Struck out because the claimant had less than two years' service and was therefore not entitled to bring an unfair dismissal complaint under section 108 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. The tribunal also recorded that the claimant did not give an acceptable reason, despite being given the opportunity, why the complaint should not be struck out. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- section 108 Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.