Case 1303486/2021 · Employment Tribunal
In Person, assisted by her sister For the v Respondent — 2024
- Case reference
- 1303486/2021
- Decision date
- 16 February 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Harding
- Panel members
- Ms Howard, Ms Whitehill
Parties
1 namedClaimant
In Person, assisted by her sister For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal sat at Midlands West on 7 to 16 February 2024 before Employment Judge Harding, sitting with Ms Howard and Ms Whitehill. The claimant appeared in person, assisted by her sister, and the respondent was represented by counsel. The judgment records a unanimous decision only, with no separate remedy award and no detailed reasons in the extracted text.
The tribunal dismissed the claimant's claims of direct race discrimination, harassment related to race, victimisation, indirect discrimination based on disability, and failure to make reasonable adjustments. The extracted judgment does not set out the underlying findings or legal reasoning beyond that final disposal, so the record reflects the outcomes exactly as stated.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race discrimination | Direct race discrimination. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Harassment | Harassment related to race. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Victimisation | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | Indirect discrimination based on disability. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | Failure to make reasonable adjustments. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.